Practical writing on AI governance, EU AI Act compliance, and AI risk — from the people who mark the assessments.
Editorial standards
Insights are written by named SAAII faculty or invited practitioners. Every post is dated, revised on the record, and cites its sources. Where we get something wrong we correct it on the same page rather than quietly editing.
First posts
Insights launch with the first cohort.
We are commissioning a first quarter of six posts covering: reading the Article 6(3) derogation in practice, what “meaningful human oversight” actually means, the ISO 42001 audit landscape at three months, cohort-1 lessons from the AI Office, the state of GPAI Code compliance, and a plain-English guide to the enforcement architecture.
Subscribe to Institute Updates
The best way to know when Insights publishes is our low-frequency Institute Updates briefing — typically one email every two to three weeks. No marketing, no sales. Just the writing, plus significant regulatory developments.
Contact us to subscribe, or write to hello@thesaaii.com.
Pitching an Insights post
If you are a working practitioner with something substantive to add to the AI governance conversation, we welcome pitches. Guidelines:
- 1,200–2,500 words
- A specific, practical angle rather than a general overview
- Written from the perspective of someone who has actually done the work
- Sources and citations where appropriate
- Disclosed commercial affiliations
Pitch to hello@thesaaii.com with a paragraph on the angle and a short bio.